Resenhas na RBL – 30.06.2009

As seguintes resenhas foram recentemente publicadas pela Review of Biblical Literature:

Richard Bauckham
Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony
Reviewed by Stephen J. Patterson

Michaela Bauks and Christophe Nihan, eds.
Manuel d’exégèse de l’Ancien Testament
Reviewed by Uwe Becker

Per Jarle Bekken
The Word Is Near You: A Study of Deuteronomy 30:12-14 in Paul’s Letter to the Romans in a Jewish Context
Reviewed by J. R. Daniel Kirk

Eric Cline
From Eden to Exile: Unraveling Mysteries of the Bible
Reviewed by Chad Spigel

Yehudah B. Cohn
Tangled Up in Text: Tefillin and the Ancient World
Reviewed by Joshua Schwartz

John Dominic Crossan and Jonathan L. Reed
In Search of Paul: How Jesus’ Apostle Opposed Rome’s Empire with God’s Kingdom
Reviewed by Elliott Maloney

Walter Dietrich; Joachim Vette, trans.
The Early Monarchy in Israel: The Tenth Century B.C.E.
Reviewed by Jeremy Hutton

Lee M. Fields
Hebrew for the Rest of Us: Using Hebrew Tools without Mastering Biblical Hebrew
Reviewed by Francis Dalrymple-Hamilton

Mary Healy
The Gospel of Mark
Reviewed by Francis J. Moloney

Jennifer L. Koosed
(Per)Mutations of Qohelet: Reading the Body in the Book
Reviewed by Harold C. Washington

Judith M. Lieu
I, II, and III John: A Commentary
Reviewed by John Painter

Gonzalo Rubio, Steven Garfinkle, Gary Beckman, and Daniel Snell; Mark Chavalas, ed.
Current Issues and the Study of the Ancient Near East
Reviewed by Aren Maeir

J. Verheyden, G. Van Belle, and J. G. van der Watt, eds.
Miracles and Imagery in Luke and John: Festschrift Ulrich Busse
Reviewed by Peter J. Judge


>> Visite: Review of Biblical Literature Blog

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 comentários em “Resenhas na RBL – 30.06.2009”

  1. Este livro de Bauckham tem potencial para promover uma verdadeira revolução kuhniana nos paradigmas das pesquisas, e a julgar pelo livro sobre João que ele escreveu logo depois, será uma revolução bem abrangente.

  2. julgo acrescentar, oportunamente, que friso a perspectiva da pesquisa,podendo até mesmo requisitar ferramentas que não são ainda tão de praxe, não necessariamente um acompanhar plenamente suas teses.

Os comentários estão encerrados.