Biblaridion e Bryan’s Biblical Links

Atualizado em

Acrescentados ao rol de biblioblogs do Observatório Bíblico, o Biblaridion, e na Ayrton’s Biblical Page, a página Bryan’s Biblical Links. Ambos de Bryan Cox, Plano, Texas, USA.

Veja também seu texto Ancient Writing [Escrita Antiga], onde você pode ler e ver imagens de como se escrevia à mão antigamente, antes da invenção da imprensa no século XV. Materiais de escrita, instrumentos, técnicas…

Obs.: página desaparecida – Observação feita em 21.02.2009, enquanto procuro links quebrados no blog…

Descoberta a cidade onde começou a revolta dos Macabeus?

Atualizado em

Segundo o jornal israelense Haaretz, são boas as chances de ter sido descoberto o local onde ficava a antiga cidade de Modin, famosa, porque foi aí que o sacerdote Matatias, contrário à helenização da Palestina, começou a conhecida revolta dos Macabeus em 167 a.C. No artigo The Hasmoneans were here – maybe, explica Ran Shapira:

In late 1995, not far from the city of Modi’in, whose construction had begun a short time earlier, several excavated burial caves were found. The find aroused tremendous excitement initially, mainly because on one of the ossuaries an engraved inscription was interpreted to read “Hasmonean.” Had they found a burial plot belonging to the family of the Hasmoneans? When the discovery was announced, the archaeologist digging there, Shimon Riklin, explained that this was not the grave built by Simon the son of Mattathias the Priest for his father and his brothers, which is described in the Book of Maccabees I. The use of ossuraies – stone containers for secondary burial, in which the bones of the dead who had been removed from their original burial place were placed – began in the second half of the first century BCE, more than a century after the beginning of the Hasmonean Revolt. However, the discovery reinforced the theory that the town of Modi’in, where the revolt broke out in 167 BCE, lay not far from the burial caves, in the area of the present-day Arab village of Midya. A short time later, the excitement died down. A thorough examination made it clear that the word “Hasmonean” was not engraved on the ossuary. The settlement from which the Hasmoneans embarked on the revolt against the Seleucid ruler Antiochus is still waiting to be discovered, as is the burial plot in which Mattathias and his sons were buried. In the decade that has passed, two prominent candidates have joined the steadily lengthening list of locations that have been proposed as the site of ancient Modi’in. The most recent is Khirbet Umm al-Umdan, a site revealed in salvage digs conducted in 2001 by Alexander Onn and Shlomit Wexler-Bdolah of the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) in the area of the city of Modi’in, on a hill north of the road that connects it with Latrun. Wexler-Bdolah and Onn propose that the site be identified as ancient Modi’in, because in their opinion, it best suits the information in the sources about the settlement in which the Priest Mattathias lived. According to ancient sources, Modi’in was a rural settlement that lay between the lowlands and the hills, alongside the main road linking Lod with Jerusalem (continua)…

Leia mais:
Os Selêucidas: a Helenização da Palestina
Os Macabeus I: A Resistência

Jesus e o Evangelho: o que realmente aconteceu?

Atualizado em

Começou no dia 21 de dezembro de 2005, quarta-feira passada, interessante debate entre Alan F. Segal, John S. Kloppenborg e Larry Hurtado sobre o Jesus histórico e o grau de historicidade das narrativas dos evangelhos.

Na forma de e-mails postados no site Slate Magazine, formando uma mesa-redonda, os três estão se perguntando: Jesus and the Gospel – What Really Happened? (Jesus e o Evangelho: o que realmente aconteceu?)

Quem são estes três especialistas?

Alan F. Segal é professor de Religião no Barnard College, Universidade de Colúmbia, USA, e ocupa a cadeira Ingeborg Rennert para o Estudo do Judaísmo. Autor de Life After Death: A History of the Afterlife in the Religions of the West, Rebecca’s Children e Paul the Convert.

John S. Kloppenborg é professor na Universidade de Toronto, Canadá, no Departamento para o Estudo da Religião. É autor de Excavating Q, The Formation of Q, co-autor da Critical Edition of Q, e o editor de Apocalypticism, Antisemitism and the Historical Jesus.


Larry Hurtado é professor de Língua, Literatura e Teologia do Novo Testamento na Universidade de Edimburgo, Escócia, e diretor do Centro para o Estudo das Origens Cristãs. Autor de How on Earth did Jesus Become a God?: Historical Questions about Earliest Devotion to Jesus e Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity.

Suas obras podem ser encontradas na Amazon.com.

Leia: Jesus and the Gospel – What Really Happened?

A batalha de Hamoukar e as âncoras do Mar Morto

Atualizado em

Você acompanhou estas duas interessantes notícias de arqueologia?

Em Tell Hamoukar, na Síria, arqueólogos sírios e norte-americanos encontraram os restos de uma grande batalha que destruiu a cidade por volta de 3500 a.C.

A huge battle destroyed one of the world’s earliest cities at around 3500 B.C. and left behind, preserved in their places, artifacts from daily life in an urban settlement in upper Mesopotamia, according to a joint announcement from the University of Chicago and the Department of Antiquities in Syria. “The whole area of our most recent excavation was a war zone,” said Clemens Reichel, Research Associate at the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Reichel, the American co-director of the Syrian-American Archaeological Expedition to Hamoukar, lead a team that spent October and November at the site. Salam al-Quntar of the Syrian Department of Antiquities and Cambridge University was Syrian co-director. Hamoukar is an ancient site in extreme northeastern Syria near the Iraqi border. The discovery provides the earliest evidence for large scale organized warfare in the Mesopotamian world, the team said (University of Chicago-Syrian team finds first evidence of warfare in ancient Mesopotamia).


E no Mar Morto, que está diminuindo drasticamente o nível de suas águas, duas âncoras, com a madeira bem preservada, acabaram descobertas. A mais antiga pode ser datada por volta de 500 a.C., e a outra é da época romana, por volta do século I d.C.

The first anchor, approximately 2,500 years old, was found where the Ein Gedi harbor was once located, and may have been used by the Jews of biblical Ein Gedi. The later anchor, some 2,000 years old, was constructed according to the best Roman technology and probably belonged to a large craft used by one of the rulers of Judea. As the sea recedes further, we may yet get to see the ship to which this anchor belonged. The 2000-year-old anchor, which originally weighed a massive 130 kg., is made from a Jujube tree and was reinforced with lead, iron and bronze. While the wooden parts are very well-preserved, its metal parts have disappeared almost entirely. Their traces have survived only in the crystals encasing the anchor. The design of the anchor is surprisingly modern: there are two flukes which were reinforced with a hook joint and a wooden plate fixed with wooden pegs, and a lead collar. The anchor also had a tripline, which was used to haul it out of the water. The ingenious earlier anchor, with some of its ropes still attached to it, is in an astonishing state of preservation. The oldest Dead Sea anchor known, it was made from the trunk of an acacia tree, with one of its branches sharpened to a point and originally reinforced with metal, to engage the seabed. Amazingly enough, most of the trunk is still covered in bark. The 12.5 meter-long ropes were made from date-palm fibers, each fashioned from three strands and lashed into grooves in the wood. Both anchors were weighted with a heavy stone lashed laterally (The Jerusalem Post).


Leia mais:
Sobre a batalha:
The Hamoukar Expedition
University of Chicago-Syrian team finds first evidence of warfare in ancient Mesopotamia

CBQ – Catholic Biblical Quarterly de outubro: considerações sobre profetas e sacerdotes

Atualizado em

Acabo de receber o número 4, de outubro de 2005, do volume 67 da CBQ – the Catholic Biblical Quarterly. O último do ano, e traz seis artigos:

Sara R. Johnson, Novelistic Elements in Esther: Persian or Hellenistic, Jewish or Greek?
Craig E. Morrison, The “Hour of Distress” in Targum Neofiti and the “Hour” in the Gospel of John
John Clabeaux, The Story of the Maltese Viper and Luke’s Apology for Paul
John Fotopoulos, Arguments Concerning Food Offered to Idols: Corinthian Quotations and Pauline Refutations in a Rhethorical Partitio (1 Corinthians 8:1-9)
Terrance Callan, The Syntax of 2 Peter 1:1-7
David J. Downs, “Early Catholicism” and Apocalypticism in the Pastoral Epistles.

Na seção Biblical News há um Report of the Sixty-eighth International Meeting of the Catholic Biblical Association of America, realizada de 6 a 9 de agosto de 2005, na Saint John’s University and Abbey, Collegeville, Minnesota. Entre outras coisas, chamou-me a atenção a prestação de contas de Linda Day, editora da revista, sobre a CBQ em 2004: 67 artigos foram recebidos pela revista, dos quais 21 foram aceitos, 28 recusados e 18 ainda estão sendo analisados. Em 2005 a revista publicou 208 resenhas de livros.

Das Resenhas, por enquanto, duas obras analisadas chamaram minha atenção. A primeira foi:

Lester L. GRABBE and Alice Ogden BELLIS (eds.), The Priests in the Prophets: The Portrayal of Priests, Prophets and Other Religious Specialists in the Latter Prophets, London: T & T Clark, 2005. Pp. xii + 230 (o preço é absurdo, como é de praxe nesta editora: $120). Este volume traz 11 ensaios que foram apresentados no encontro da SBL de 2002, realizado em Toronto, ocasião em que o grupo dedicado ao tema “Textos Proféticos e seus Antigos Contextos” (Prophetic Texts and Their Ancient Contexts), discutiu o assunto do título.

Lester L. Grabbe, na “Introdução”, sintetizou as posições dos autores sobre o assunto debatido em 4 direções: 1. a natureza do antagonismo, sustentado por muitos especialistas, entre sacerdotes e profetas; 2. o lugar (ou função) do sacerdote nas sociedades israelita e judaíta; 3. a relação dos profetas com o culto; 4. a relação dos sacerdotes com adivinhos, profetas e intelectuais. A resenha foi feita por Dale Launderville, St. John’s University, Collegeville, MN, que no final recomenda a obra para as bibliotecas, talvez por seu preço abusivo!

Na página da editora T & T Clark, há a seguinte descrição da obra:

Since at least the 19th century Hebrew Bible scholarship has traditionally seen priests and prophets as natural opponents, with different social spheres and worldviews. In recent years several studies have started to question this perspective. The Priests in the Prophets examines how the priests are portrayed in the Latter Prophets and analyzes the relationship between priests and prophets. The contributors also provide insights into the place of priests, prophets, and some other religious
specialists in Israelite and Judean society in pre-exilic and post-exilic times.

Ou seja: estaria ocorrendo, nos últimos anos, uma mudança da postura, assumida pelos especialistas desde o século XIX, sobre a relação entre sacerdotes e profetas como oponentes naturais. Nos últimos anos, muitos estudos começaram a questionar esta perspectiva…

Li também duas outras resenhas sobre o livro e que foram publicadas pela Review of Biblical Literature.

A de Jacob L. Wright, da Universidade de Heidelberg, Alemanha, publicada em 09 de julho de 2005, que assim termina seu texto:

That the prophets’ criticism of the cult was directed at the incumbents of the priestly office, not the office itself, has been forcefully argued from a wide range of perspectives in this volume. After reading it, I am once again impressed by the need for more research on the place of the Jerusalem temple in the politics and economy of Judah during the Babylonian, Persian, and Hellenistic periods. This research is indeed indispensable to our ongoing attempt to appreciate the social and religious factors that motivated the prophets’ criticisms of the priests.

A de Henrietta L. Wiley, Denison University, Granville, OH, USA, publicada em 17 de dezembro de 2005 e que diz, ainda no começo de seu texto:

Most of the questions that these authors address pertain to the history of Israelite religious life. What were historical characteristics of the roles of priest and prophet? How did they interact? To what historical realities of cultic politics and public worship are the authors of the prophetic books responding? Some pieces address these issues as they relate to specific passages in prophetic literature, while others concern themselves with the role of prophets in general vis-à-vis the cult. Among those in the latter category, a number address the idea that there was bitter antagonism between priests and prophets. This notion has dominated Protestant scholarship for decades, if not centuries, with the claim that prophets of Yahweh preached a religion of ethics against priestly legalism and ritualism that sought not to serve Yahweh but to imitate the imitate Israel’s pagan neighbors. Several of the authors in this volume refute this claim quite nicely.

Bom, como gosto de estudar o profetismo bíblico, é algo que devo tomar como uma “provocação” a ser considerada. “Oponentes naturais” eu não diria, mas continuo a ver, em muitos profetas, uma crítica muito profunda ao modo como o sacerdócio era exercido em Betel, em Jerusalém e, talvez, em outros lugares…

Por outro lado, concordo com Jacob L. Wright, quando ele diz que é necessário aprofundarmos o conhecimento sobre a função do Templo de Jerusalém na política e na economia de Judá durante as épocas babilônica, persa e helenística. O conhecimento destes elementos é fundamental para que possamos avaliar os fatores sociais e religiosos que motivaram a crítica dos profetas aos sacerdotes.

A segunda resenha que me chamou a atenção foi:

Louise J. LAWRENCE and Mario I. AGUILAR (eds.), Anthropology and Biblical Studies: Avenues of Approach, Leiden: Deo, 2004. Pp. 324 $29.95 (resenha feita por John J. Pilch, Georgetown University, Washington, DC).

Isto tem a ver com minha proposta de leitura sócio-antropológica dos textos bíblicos. Mas o comentário desta obra fica para outra ocasião.

Luedemann concorda em manter com M. Goodacre amistoso diálogo

Atualizado em

Em Bíblical Theology, Jim West postou hoje mais uma mensagem de Lüdemann. Ele se propõe a manter um amistoso diálogo com Mark Goodacre, já que suas posições não são assim tão divergentes, como algumas ásperas palavras podem ter dado a entender. Sob o título Agreement! Luedemann Responds to Goodacre [Obs.: link quebrado – blog descontinuado], dado por Jim ao post, está a proposta de Lüdemann:

I agree that the two of us are not as far apart as our contentious words may have suggested. I do look forward to further mutually respectful exchanges with Professor Goodacre on matters of mutual interest.Sincerely,Gerd Lüdemann

Jim West sai em defesa de Luedemann e este responde a Mark Goodacre e Stephen C. Carlson

Atualizado em

O caso Lüdemann está rendendo…

A defesa de Jim West é uma crítica do autoritarismo presente na Igreja alemã à qual pertence Lüdemann, comparando o caso de David Friedrich Strauss (1808-1874), punido quando lecionava na Universidade de Zurique, Suíça, com o de Gerd Lüdemann, afastado, no final do século XX, da cadeira de Novo Testamento da Faculdade de Teologia da Universidade de Göttingen, Alemanha.

Cito dois pequenos trechos da defesa de Jim West:

A very long time ago a gifted young scholar wrote an impressive, indeed, a groundbreaking work. It was a historical investigation of the Life of Jesus and it’s author was David Friedrich Strauss. Strauss was invited, as a result of that work, to teach at the University of Zurich. When conservative reactionaries got wind of the impending appointment they raised such a ruckus that the governing board (to their eternal shame so far as I am concerned), withdrew the call and pentioned young Strauss off. What had begun with the promise of a very fine academic appointment ended in bitter disillusionment. Strauss’s fury was unleashed against the religionists who, according to him, had ruined his life. He spent the rest of his life, a bitter and disappointed man, doing his best to undermine the facile historical ideology of his enemies (…)Fast forward, now, to the 20th century and change locations from Switzerland to Germany. Precisely the same sort of situation arose when Lüdemann published his work on the Historical Jesus. The same fundamentalists (with different faces but the same spirits) objected so loudly, so forcefully, so maliciously, that the esteemed people on the Board of Governors (or whatever they are in the German University system) buckled to the pressure and denied Gerd his rightful place. To their eternal shame, I might add.


Já Mark Goodacre começa seu post de hoje assim:

I have just received this response from Gerd Lüdemann to my comments on his press release (The Christmas Stories are Pious Fairy Tales) and Gerd asks if I would place this in my blog, which I am of course happy to do. I am knee-deep in grading (that’s what they call “marking” here) at the moment but I am looking forward to commenting later. The message below is as I received it from Prof. Lüdemann, with my original blog post in lower case (but combining parts of the press release and my comments) and Prof. Lüdemann’s responses in upper case.

Leia mais:
In Defense of Gerd Lüdemann (em Biblical Theology – Jim West) [Obs.: link quebrado – blog descontinuado]Response to Mark Goodacre and Stephen Carlson by Gerd Lüdemann (em Mark Goodacre’s NT Blog)

A redescoberta de Maria Madalena

Atualizado em

Fenômeno que vale a pena acompanhar é a crescente onda de publicações, em livros e artigos impressos e na Internet, sobre quem foi Maria Madalena. Hoje li, cuidadosamente, a FAQ e as diferentes perspectivas sob as quais a figura de Madalena é abordada, presentes no site de Lesa Bellevie, Magdalene.org. Suas colocações, extremamente claras, pareceram-me muito bem feitas e úteis para quem quiser entrar nesta discussão, que se tornou bem “quente” após a publicação e o sucesso de vendas do livro O Código Da Vinci, de Dan Brown.

Diz a autora sobre as diferentes perspectivas sobre Maria Madalena:

When it comes to Mary Magdalene, there is one word that can be applied more than any other: “controversial.” There are many different views currently in circulation on who she may have been and what her importance really was, so we’re presenting the most popular views that you should know about. Traditional Christian; Gnostic; Apostle; Holy Grail: Bloodline; Holy Grail: Lost Feminine; Beloved Disciple; Temple Priestess.

E recomenda o seguinte roteiro para o visitante de seu site:

We recommend that you start with our Frequently Asked Questions, and then jump to our section about the different perspectives on Mary Magdalene currently in circulation. Afterward, you may wish to check out some of the source documents and sacred writings from the earliest days of Christianity. It is from these texts that scholars have pieced together their pictures of Mary Magdalene. When you’ve gotten a better idea of what it is about Mary Magdalene you’d like to explore, you may want to read some articles exploring different areas of Magdalene scholarship and spirituality.

Além do site, Lesa Bellevie mantém também um blog sobre o mesmo tema, The Magdalene Review, que acrescentei à minha lista de Biblioblogs do Observatório Bíblico.

Onde Encontrar: Ayrton’s Biblical Page > Links e Biblioblogs

Resenha de Croatto sobre o livro dos Biblistas Mineiros

Atualizado em

Acho que andei meio distraído, mas só hoje é que li a resenha feita por J. Severino Croatto, o saudoso exegeta argentino, sobre o livro publicado pelos Biblistas Mineiros em 2003, História de Israel e as pesquisas mais recentes… Resenha bastante positiva, elogiosa até, em muitos aspectos.

Sobre o livro diz Croatto:

Este livro, tendo como enfoque a problemática do histórico em seus diferentes sentidos, oferece um panorama tanto expositivo, quanto crítico do que os livros bíblicos “dizem” e do que a ciência bíblica investiga.

Sobre o meu capítulo, leio:

Um ensaio sumamente útil para o leitor é o de Airton José da Silva (cap. 3) sobre “A história de Israel na pesquisa atual” (p. 43-87). Os pontos essenciais da problemática histórica: patriarcas, história javista, diferença entre Canaã e Israel, existência de um império davídico-salomônico ou do exílio babilônico, assim como a questão do “Israel” das origens, são tratados de forma muito sintética, mas clara. É excelente a referência aos mais recentes autores que estão discutindo estes assuntos, e valiosa a bibliografia utilizada, que, aliás, inclui dados informativos. Realmente, uma síntese inteligente do tema, tal como está sendo debatido nos círculos acadêmicos.

A resenha está publicada, em português e espanhol, no site do Frei Jacir, organizador do livro. Leia mais sobre a resenha, sobre o livro, sobre J. Severino Croatto, falecido em 2004, visite o site de Jacir de Freitas Faria, Bíblia e Apócrifos.

Onde Encontrar: Ayrton’s Biblical Page > Publicações